（NYT，2019-9-3）
By choosing
violence and intimidation to silence Hong Kong, the Chinese Communist Party is
once again showing its true nature. Beijing recently reinforced its People’s
Liberation Army garrison in Hong Kong with thousands of troops and authorized a
new wave of arrests to intimidate peaceful demonstrators. In parallel, it
reportedly blocked the Hong Kong government’s proposal to work out a compromise
with the city’s massive and grassroots pro-democracy movement.
What began as
a protest against an unjust extradition bill backed by China has now become a
fight for Hong Kong’s autonomy and future. Yet what’s happening in Hong Kong is
not simply China’s internal affair. The United States and other responsible
nations are not watching from the sidelines.
The extradition
bill is only the latest example of China’s many broken promises to the Hong
Kong people and the world. Most obviously, the Chinese Communist Party is
preventing the city’s government from acting with the autonomy that Beijing had
promised it in a legally binding 1984 international treaty with Britain, under
Hong Kong’s Basic Law, and in China’s diplomatic outreach to the United States
and other nations.
In 2014,
Beijing also backed off its commitment to allow Hong Kong citizens to choose
their city’s chief executive through universal suffrage, a provocation that
sparked the city’s massive Umbrella Movement protests. And in 2016 and 2017 ,
the High Court disqualified a total of six democratic lawmakers from their
Legislative Council seats using a controversial interpretation of Hong Kong’s
constitution.
Thirty years
after People’s Liberation Army troops massacred reform activists and ordinary
Chinese citizens on the way to Tiananmen Square, Beijing now appears poised to
intervene overtly and aggressively in Hong Kong.
The
paramilitary People’s Armed Police — built up in the aftermath of the Tiananmen
massacre — has thousands of personnel and vehicles in Shenzhen, just across the
boundary between mainland China and Hong Kong. Chinese officials and state
media have steadily escalated their warning rhetoric and outlined what they
describe as the legal case for intervention based on “signs of terrorism.” An
unsigned editorial in Xinhua, a state-run news agency reflecting the
institutional voice of the party center, claimed that Hong Kong is engaged in a
“color revolution.”
The world
ignores these warning signals at the peril of the Hong Kong people and the
hundreds of thousands of foreigners — including roughly 85,000 U.S. citizens —
living in the city. China’s leaders today are using the same messaging playbook
that they have followed since they intervened in North Korea in 1950. We were
surprised then; we should be prepared now.
The United
States and the international community must make clear to Chinese leaders and
power brokers that their aggression toward Hong Kong risks swift, severe and
lasting consequences.
In particular,
the administration should make clear that the United States can respond flexibly
and robustly in Hong Kong. Our options are much more than just a “nuclear
option” of ending Hong Kong’s special status under U.S. law.
The Hong Kong
Policy Act, authored by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and enacted in 1992,
allows the president to apply to Hong Kong those laws that address the People’s
Republic of China. The law’s power is selective and flexible, however, and not
necessarily all-or-nothing for Hong Kong’s special status. For example, the
Tiananmen sanctions could be applied to target the city’s police force, which
has collaborated with organized crime, instigated violence and now might be torturing
detained demonstrators.
Hong Kong’s
special status — and therefore Beijing’s ability to exploit and benefit from it
— depends on the city being treated as a separate customs area, on open
international financial connections and on the Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
U.S. dollar. The United States both administratively and diplomatically can
constrain these conditions.
The
administration also can impose sanctions against individual officials who have
committed serious human rights abuses under the Global Magnitsky Act, which
enables sanctions against foreign individuals or entities. In addition,
Congress should pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, a bill that
I co-authored with Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), James E. Risch (R-Idaho) and
Robert Menendez (D-N.J.). The bill, among other things, would mandate that
officials in China and Hong Kong who have undermined the city’s autonomy are
vulnerable to such sanctions.
The United
States and other nations have options precisely because Beijing benefits from
Hong Kong’s special status. Indeed, the city has proved irreplaceable as a
gateway for international finance, even as China attempts to build up a
mainland alternative.
China’s
leaders must either respect Hong Kong’s autonomy and rule of law or know that
their escalating aggression will inexorably lead them to face swift, severe and
lasting consequences from the United States and the world. Today, that choice
is theirs.
